User talk:Grimholtz: Difference between revisions

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(duplicate links)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''Changed "Using XPath" to "XPath" per asqueella''
Grimholtz, it isn't necessary to link each occurrence of a word/phrase in an article. In fact it usually looks better when you don't do so. IMO, linking the first occurrence of a word in an article (or in a section - for long sections) is enough. E.g:
:''Changed "How to Create a DOM tree" to "Creating DOM Trees" per asqueella''
You didn't understand. I meant use those in articles' titles, not when linking to them. In fact on listing pages, such as [[:Category:Example code]], using longer text for links and including some details about articles you link to - is a good idea. I reverted those changes, hope you don't mind :) [[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]


::I did understand. I just thought they were more concise that way.
''Good:'' [[Killing dinosaurs]] is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.<br/>
''Bad:'' [[Killing dinosaurs]] is bad. Do not ever think of [[killing dinosaurs]].
 
[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]

Revision as of 19:26, 28 March 2005

Grimholtz, it isn't necessary to link each occurrence of a word/phrase in an article. In fact it usually looks better when you don't do so. IMO, linking the first occurrence of a word in an article (or in a section - for long sections) is enough. E.g:

Good: Killing dinosaurs is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.
Bad: Killing dinosaurs is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.

asqueella