User talk:Grimholtz: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
(duplicate links) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Grimholtz, it isn't necessary to link each occurrence of a word/phrase in an article. In fact it usually looks better when you don't do so. IMO, linking the first occurrence of a word in an article (or in a section - for long sections) is enough. E.g: | |||
:: | ''Good:'' [[Killing dinosaurs]] is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.<br/> | ||
''Bad:'' [[Killing dinosaurs]] is bad. Do not ever think of [[killing dinosaurs]]. | |||
[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] |
Revision as of 19:26, 28 March 2005
Grimholtz, it isn't necessary to link each occurrence of a word/phrase in an article. In fact it usually looks better when you don't do so. IMO, linking the first occurrence of a word in an article (or in a section - for long sections) is enough. E.g:
Good: Killing dinosaurs is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.
Bad: Killing dinosaurs is bad. Do not ever think of killing dinosaurs.