Talk:Starting your Mozilla application with a specified profileFrom MozillaZine Knowledge Base[edit] Splitting up this articleI should probably make two articles by spinning off the first section to a new article on starting Mozilla applications with a specified profile, since that section also applies SeaMonkey and Mozilla Suite. The "Bypassing the Profile Manager" and "Creating an unlisted profile" sections would then be a separate article, since Mozilla Suite and SeaMonkey 1.x do not support the -profile <path> argument . Alice 22:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Done: Windows shortcut to a specific profile Alice 01:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC) I think you are making things too complex, and too pigeon holed. Its useful to lump all of the different ways to spawn an application with a specified profile in one article. While I understand that the majority of our users are windows users you're short changing OSX and Linux users by creating a Windows specific article when there was no real reason to be operating system specific. Are you assuming they're going to read the windows specific article, or are you going to spin off more? If the former, what was gained? I don't see the harm in making this article generic, and mentioning that certain sections don't apply to SeaMonkey/Mozilla suite. While its good to add explicit support for SeaMonkey in articles given the relative popularity of the different applications fragmenting the article mainly to make it a little cleaner for SeaMonkey seems unnecessarily disruptive. Its not clear why different assumptions are made about the path in the desktop shortcut and run dialog sections, while the "Creating an unlisted profile" doesn't deal with path issues at all. I suggest the "Creating an unlisted profile" section be renamed to make it clearer that the real intent is to specify a profile without relying upon the profile manager. i.e. the focus should be on troubleshooting , not hiding footprints. Profile_Manager has a "Shortcut to a specific profile" section. I think it should stay, despite the duplication with "desktop shortcut". However, looking at this articles "run dialog" section, it makes me wonder why spawning the profile manager and choosing the profile from the list was ignored. This yet another reason why I'd prefer to have one article that lists the different ways to start an application with a specific profile. Adding some text for it, plus a image would add value. I don't see the value in a separate Windows shortcut to a specific profile article, especially since its misnamed. Using the run dialog has nothing to do with shortcuts. Tanstaafl 02:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
|
|