Talk:Quality Feedback Agent: Difference between revisions

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (crashing threads)
Line 1: Line 1:
dvgrn 4/6/2005> The "example Talkback crash report" link (under "What is a stack trace?") is probably going to keep going out of date periodically, as old crash reports are deleted from the database.  I just updated it to the newest possible Talkback report, so it should be good for a while.  (But I don't know enough to say for sure whether this new random sample is a '''good''' example of a stack trace...)
dvgrn 4/6/2005> The "example Talkback crash report" link (under "What is a stack trace?") is probably going to keep going out of date periodically, as old crash reports are deleted from the database.  I just updated it to the newest possible Talkback report, so it should be good for a while.  (But I don't know enough to say for sure whether this new random sample is a '''good''' example of a stack trace...)
== crashing threads ==
I have a [http://home.kimo.com.tw/mook_moz/ crash2.cpp] (linked on the page - the host does referrer checking) that lets you crash in a specified thread on WinXP; you still need the process and thread IDs from process explorer, and plus I don't have a binary.  Someone take this and run with it? ;)
--[[User:Mook|Mook]] 15:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:40, 11 January 2006

dvgrn 4/6/2005> The "example Talkback crash report" link (under "What is a stack trace?") is probably going to keep going out of date periodically, as old crash reports are deleted from the database. I just updated it to the newest possible Talkback report, so it should be good for a while. (But I don't know enough to say for sure whether this new random sample is a good example of a stack trace...)

crashing threads

I have a crash2.cpp (linked on the page - the host does referrer checking) that lets you crash in a specified thread on WinXP; you still need the process and thread IDs from process explorer, and plus I don't have a binary. Someone take this and run with it? ;) --Mook 15:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)