Talk:Product comparison matrix: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (suggest update versions to Moz1.7.5, TB 1.0) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
: Done. --[[User:Hao2lian|hao2lian]] | : Done. --[[User:Hao2lian|hao2lian]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
This page needs to be updated | |||
This page needs to be updated to [[Mozilla Suite]] 1.7.5, and [[Mozilla Thunderbird]] 1.0 | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Update this page or unlock it! Damn, even the main page is unlocked! [[User:Lornova|Lornova]] 13:11, 18 Nov 2004 (PST) | Update this page or unlock it! Damn, even the main page is unlocked! [[User:Lornova|Lornova]] 13:11, 18 Nov 2004 (PST) |
Revision as of 00:23, 29 December 2004
- Old Talk messages can be accessed via Page History
I think "prefs" and ".js files" have been left out of the Mozilla Suite/Firefox customisability box. I do not think Opera is "ridiculously" more customisable compared to the other browsers. Apart from that, this comparison page is much more accurate and balanced than the last one. Andrewg_scss
- That's the same thing as about:config, except that has no user interface; Opera is ridiculously customizable, you should check its forums. Anyhoo, a developer of Opera who's a friend of Mozilla.org came in and wrote that, so who am I to undo that? =) --hao2lian
Scarrow:
How about adding the venerable Pegasus Mail client to the mail client comparison table?
I'd do it myself, but it's protected. :}
Vital statistics:
Version: 4.21c
Platforms supported: Windows
Cost: Free
Open Source: No
Ability to block spam: Yes (Not quite certain in regards to which species of filtering they're employing).
Extensions: Yes
Themes: No
More info can be gleaned from the link above.
- Done. --hao2lian
This page needs to be updated to Mozilla Suite 1.7.5, and Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0
Update this page or unlock it! Damn, even the main page is unlocked! Lornova 13:11, 18 Nov 2004 (PST)