MozillaZine

Talk:Performance - Thunderbird

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 14:51, 15 January 2013
Stualden (Talk | contribs)
(Reference to "xul.mfl" file)
<-- Previous diff
Revision as of 12:23, 5 June 2016
Wsm (Talk | contribs)

Next diff -->
Line 4: Line 4:
There is a reference here to a "xul.mfl" file that can get corrupted. I do not see this file anywhere on my current Thunderbird setups (as of January 2013). Do recent versions of Thunderbird not use this, and if not, could the reference to it here be deleted? There is a reference here to a "xul.mfl" file that can get corrupted. I do not see this file anywhere on my current Thunderbird setups (as of January 2013). Do recent versions of Thunderbird not use this, and if not, could the reference to it here be deleted?
 +
 +== 2016 ==
 +Given modern hardware I don't believe this section is currently true/relevant "Why it's slower than the competition". [[User:Wsm|wsmwk]] 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +"Thunderbird appears to parse the contents of the entire Inbox folder when it fetches..." is difficult to parse (I didn't attempt to) and frankly I'm not sure it is true today. It should be reevaluated and probably removed. [[User:Wsm|wsmwk]] 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +"Thunderbird 3.* uses approximately 50MB within a couple minutes under Windows. ..." is ancient history,and the figures are no longer accurate for current versions and therefore misleading. [[User:Wsm|wsmwk]] 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:23, 5 June 2016

"Why it's slower than the competition". The "it's slow because it's XUL" is not correct and it doesn't help promoting Mozilla-as-platform. Unless you have a really old computer, Thunderbird will not be slow because of XUL. After all, Firefox is written in XUL and one of its selling points is that it is faster. --asqueella 09:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Reference to "xul.mfl" file

There is a reference here to a "xul.mfl" file that can get corrupted. I do not see this file anywhere on my current Thunderbird setups (as of January 2013). Do recent versions of Thunderbird not use this, and if not, could the reference to it here be deleted?

2016

Given modern hardware I don't believe this section is currently true/relevant "Why it's slower than the competition". wsmwk 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

"Thunderbird appears to parse the contents of the entire Inbox folder when it fetches..." is difficult to parse (I didn't attempt to) and frankly I'm not sure it is true today. It should be reevaluated and probably removed. wsmwk 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

"Thunderbird 3.* uses approximately 50MB within a couple minutes under Windows. ..." is ancient history,and the figures are no longer accurate for current versions and therefore misleading. wsmwk 12:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)