Talk:Performance - Thunderbird: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:Performance (Thunderbird) moved to Talk:Performance - Thunderbird: Conform to article naming conventions and workaround wiki bug) |
(Reference to "xul.mfl" file) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Why it's slower than the competition". The "it's slow because it's XUL" is not correct and it doesn't help promoting Mozilla-as-platform. Unless you have a really old computer, Thunderbird will not be slow because of XUL. After all, Firefox is written in XUL and one of its selling points is that it is ''faster''. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] 09:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | "Why it's slower than the competition". The "it's slow because it's XUL" is not correct and it doesn't help promoting Mozilla-as-platform. Unless you have a really old computer, Thunderbird will not be slow because of XUL. After all, Firefox is written in XUL and one of its selling points is that it is ''faster''. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] 09:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Reference to "xul.mfl" file == | |||
There is a reference here to a "xul.mfl" file that can get corrupted. I do not see this file anywhere on my current Thunderbird setups (as of January 2013). Do recent versions of Thunderbird not use this, and if not, could the reference to it here be deleted? | |||
Revision as of 14:51, 15 January 2013
"Why it's slower than the competition". The "it's slow because it's XUL" is not correct and it doesn't help promoting Mozilla-as-platform. Unless you have a really old computer, Thunderbird will not be slow because of XUL. After all, Firefox is written in XUL and one of its selling points is that it is faster. --asqueella 09:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Reference to "xul.mfl" file
There is a reference here to a "xul.mfl" file that can get corrupted. I do not see this file anywhere on my current Thunderbird setups (as of January 2013). Do recent versions of Thunderbird not use this, and if not, could the reference to it here be deleted?
