Talk:Error loading websites: Difference between revisions

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:


I think that's a bit too technical for our audience. Also, I'm guessing there could be many things wrong with a router so suggesting this one specific thing isn't likely to help.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I think that's a bit too technical for our audience. Also, I'm guessing there could be many things wrong with a router so suggesting this one specific thing isn't likely to help.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
:It's been removed.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


==Keyword lookup==
==Keyword lookup==
Line 48: Line 49:


While this is true, it wouldn't cause an ''error'', would it? Rather, it would bring the user to an unexpected place.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
While this is true, it wouldn't cause an ''error'', would it? Rather, it would bring the user to an unexpected place.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
:It's been removed.--[[User:Np|Np]] 21:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:04, 8 February 2007

Consolidated article

There was a discussion started here about whether the three "website" articles that this one links to, should be combined into one article (possibly this one). That would avoid confusion about which article contains what information, and the three articles do overlap. Alice Wyman 01:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

...and, there was also a discussion about the overlap between the "any website" and "some websites" articles on the Talk:Error_loading_some_websites page. Alice Wyman 02:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

BTW, did you post this discussion in Knowledge Base changes? --name already taken 02:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
No I didn't. I'll do that now!! Alice Wyman 23:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
My only concern is that the article might be too long to be usable, but we could see how it works by merging them in a sandbox for testing. --name already taken 07:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe we could shorten the Error loading any website article first, possibly by replacing all the information in the "Firewalls" section about specific Firewall programs (after "Here is some firewall-specific information:") with a link to a new "Firewalls" article? <snipped Alice Wyman 23:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)> That would make the Error loading any website article much shorter. Alice Wyman 13:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Good idea. A separate firewall article is an improvement, and it would make it straightforward to combine the other 3 (4). The proposed firewall article looks fine. AnotherGuest.
OK, I added that suggestion to Talk:Error loading any website. Lets wait to see if there are any objections. If not, I'll create the new Firewalls article and replace that content with a link in the Error loading any website article. After that's done, the three articles can be combined into one :-) Alice Wyman 14:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Alice asked me to look at this proposal page. Dickvl
I like the idea about a separate firewall article. There was an update to Fx 1.5.0.5 and with every update most problems are a firewall problem or localstore / lost bookmarks. Firewall problems start after an update / reinstall of Fx or maybe an update of the firewall program. Once that setup is ok then it should work fine.
About DNS problems: if you have a ISP with bandwidth problems of the DNServers then you can never predict what happens if you visit a site. I think it is better not to confuse the users with whether a problem is random or that it only happens on a few websites (some DNServers can also have bad or missing entries for specific sites). Sometimes a website blocks certains IP's
Connection Settings: I miss a description on where to find the IE settings. Most users won't know where to look for it. (e.g. Control Panel -> Internet Options -> Connections: LAN)
Dickvl 20:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
There is now a new Firewalls article. I guess we can shorten the Error loading any website article now and link to it. (done!) At that point, I guess we can combine the three "website" articles into one, as originally planned, under Error loading websites? Alice Wyman 19:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I consolidated all three "website" articles and placed my proposed new "Error loading websites" article here:<snip>. I figured it would be better to work off my user page, same as for the Firewalls article, before making the change for real. Anyone who likes can edit away or create their own version :-) Alice Wyman 23:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and implemented the changes and redirected the other articles to this one. Alice Wyman 10:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S. I didn't do anything with the associated Talk pages..... Those pages are still located at Talk:Error loading any website Talk:Error loading some websites and Talk:Websites randomly don't load Alice Wyman 15:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Utilities that modify Fx settings

Moved to Knowledge Base changes.

DNS - link to wdnslookup.exe

You can check the speed of your DNS server by downloading a small program, "wdnslookup.exe", which was written by a MozillaZine moderator. ..... AnotherGuest, you added this to the article under the DNS section yesterday but you didn't include any documentation or reference link. I'm leery about adding direct .exe links like that to the KB as a matter of principle. At the very least, the link should be to a forum post or to a webpage that includes more information. Alice Wyman 20:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

...Update: <snip> Trolly has put up a webpage here that includes a wdnslookup.exe download link and additional information, which I added to the article with his permission. Alice Wyman 19:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC) ....

Router problems?

Routers may redirect the request to fetch a page from a particular IP-address to the local network if the subnet mask has been defined too broadly. For example: if you are behind a router or some device that functions like a router (e.g. a storage gateway) with the following (fictitious) settings: IP-address 80.80.80.194 and subnet-mask 255.0.0.0 then (at least with some routers) no website with an IP-address beginning with 80 (80.x.x.x) will load because the request will never go out to the internet. You will notice that the packet gets lost when you ping the IP-address in question. The subnetmask should be defined more narrowly. If for instance your fixed IP-address is part of a range of a few IP-addresses on a local network, then the subnetmask might be defined as for instance: 255.255.255.248 or if it's the only one, as: 255.255.255.0. Some sources will tell you that this is the wrong subnet-mask for a class A IP-address. They may be right, but then the algorithm in some routers is probably wrong. Try it out anyway. You might well find that the websites that previously wouldn't load, now will. Try it out to see if this does the trick.

I think that's a bit too technical for our audience. Also, I'm guessing there could be many things wrong with a router so suggesting this one specific thing isn't likely to help.--Np 21:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

It's been removed.--Np 21:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Keyword lookup

If you type an incomplete address or if you try to access a Web site by Internet keyword, your browser will attempt to fill in the missing information or supply the correct URL for the keyword. Your Internet service provider or proxy service may also do this. The results may vary, depending on your browser settings and your environment. See Keyword.URL and Keyword.enabled for more information.

While this is true, it wouldn't cause an error, would it? Rather, it would bring the user to an unexpected place.--Np 21:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

It's been removed.--Np 21:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)