MozillaZine

Pages voted for deletion

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 13:20, 10 April 2005
Wintogreen (Talk | contribs)

<-- Previous diff
Revision as of 14:27, 10 April 2005
Asqueella (Talk | contribs)

Next diff -->
Line 27: Line 27:
** Note, that thanks to Fatalis, the history of [[Extension development]] is on that page. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] ** Note, that thanks to Fatalis, the history of [[Extension development]] is on that page. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]
***Hm. Would it work to move that page (e.g., to "Extensions development history")? It seems bad to have search for "extensions" default to a blank page like that. --wint. ***Hm. Would it work to move that page (e.g., to "Extensions development history")? It seems bad to have search for "extensions" default to a blank page like that. --wint.
 +****I think no, but would like to be proven wrong. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]

Revision as of 14:27, 10 April 2005

Last set of articles deleted. Some were special and deserve special mention. --hao2lian

--asqueella



Redirected to In-House Style.
The article that needed to be deleted was the redirect article, Articles_naming_conventions (note the plural "articles" in title). The article with correct name, Article naming conventions was created deliberately and is complementary to In-House Style page. --asqueella 09:42, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT)
Added the stub message instead, in case someone wants to expand on the article in the future.
  • Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
Seconded. --asqueella
Made it redirect to this page, just in case it ever does become useful.

Add to this page articles you think should be deleted.

  • Extensions: currently empty, and not good because if you type "extensions" in the search field and hit Enter, you get this blank page; nothing links to it but User talk:Fatalis. --wintogreen
    • Note, that thanks to Fatalis, the history of Extension development is on that page. --asqueella
      • Hm. Would it work to move that page (e.g., to "Extensions development history")? It seems bad to have search for "extensions" default to a blank page like that. --wint.
        • I think no, but would like to be proven wrong. --asqueella