Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Went through!) |
(regarding Articles_naming_conventions) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [[Articles naming conventions]]/[[Talk:Articles naming conventions]] -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments | * [[Articles naming conventions]]/[[Talk:Articles naming conventions]] -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments | ||
: Redirected to [[In-House Style]]. | : Redirected to [[In-House Style]]. | ||
::The article that needed to be deleted was the redirect article, [[Articles_naming_conventions]] (note the plural "articles" in title). The article with correct name, [[Article naming conventions]] was created deliberately and is complementary to In-House Style page. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] 09:42, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT) | |||
* [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | * [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) |
Revision as of 16:42, 9 April 2005
Last set of articles deleted. Some were special and deserve special mention. --hao2lian
- Articles naming conventions/Talk:Articles naming conventions -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments
- Redirected to In-House Style.
- The article that needed to be deleted was the redirect article, Articles_naming_conventions (note the plural "articles" in title). The article with correct name, Article naming conventions was created deliberately and is complementary to In-House Style page. --asqueella 09:42, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT)
- Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Added the stub message instead, in case someone wants to expand on the article in the future.
- Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
- Seconded. --asqueella
- Made it redirect to this page, just in case it ever does become useful.
Add to this page articles you think should be deleted.