MozillaZine

Pages voted for deletion

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2005
Asqueella (Talk | contribs)
(second wintogreen's suggestion)
<-- Previous diff
Revision as of 20:05, 29 March 2005
Asqueella (Talk | contribs)
(Articles naming conventions)
Next diff -->
Line 4: Line 4:
*[[Dev : Extensions : Beginner]], old redirect (now double-redirect) page. *[[Dev : Extensions : Beginner]], old redirect (now double-redirect) page.
*[[Bob_jackson]] - vandalism *[[Bob_jackson]] - vandalism
-[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]+* [[Articles naming conventions]]/[[Talk:Articles naming conventions]] -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments :(
 +--[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]
* [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) * [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)

Revision as of 20:05, 29 March 2005

Last set of articles deleted. Hopefully, I haven't missed anything. Thanks to everyone for pointing them out. Cookies all around! --hao2lian

--asqueella

  • Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
  • Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen
  • Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
Seconded. --asqueella