Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(second wintogreen's suggestion) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt]]: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen | * [[Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt]]: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen | ||
* [[Kb:Votes for deletion]]. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as [[Kb:Deletion policy]]). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen | * [[Kb:Votes for deletion]]. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as [[Kb:Deletion policy]]). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen | ||
:: Seconded. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] | |||
Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2005
Last set of articles deleted. Hopefully, I haven't missed anything. Thanks to everyone for pointing them out. Cookies all around! --hao2lian
- Dev : Extensions : Beginner, old redirect (now double-redirect) page.
- Bob_jackson - vandalism
- Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen
- Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
- Seconded. --asqueella
