Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
Wintogreen (talk | contribs) |
Wintogreen (talk | contribs) (delete me) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | * [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
* [[Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt]]: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen | * [[Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt]]: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen | ||
* [[Kb:Votes for deletion]]. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as [[Kb:Deletion policy]]). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen |
Revision as of 07:39, 29 March 2005
Imitating how Wikipedia does it. Last set of pages deleted. --hao2lian, 2005-01-30
Last set of articles deleted. Hopefully, I haven't missed anything. Thanks to everyone for pointing them out. Cookies all around! --hao2lian
- Dev : Extensions : Beginner, old redirect (now double-redirect) page.
- Bob_jackson - vandalism
- Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen
- Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen