Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
* [[Kb:Votes for deletion]]. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as [[Kb:Deletion policy]]). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
* [[Kb:Votes for deletion]]. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as [[Kb:Deletion policy]]). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
:: Seconded. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]
:: Seconded. --[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]]
* [[Thunderbird : Issues : Cannot Get Messages]]: a support question that should have been asked in the forums --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 19:31, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT)

Revision as of 02:31, 6 April 2005

Last set of articles deleted. Hopefully, I haven't missed anything. Thanks to everyone for pointing them out. Cookies all around! --hao2lian

--asqueella

  • Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
  • Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen
  • Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
Seconded. --asqueella