Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions
From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
(second wintogreen's suggestion) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[Dev : Extensions : Beginner]], old redirect (now double-redirect) page. | *[[Dev : Extensions : Beginner]], old redirect (now double-redirect) page. | ||
*[[Bob_jackson]] - vandalism | *[[Bob_jackson]] - vandalism | ||
[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] | * [[Articles naming conventions]]/[[Talk:Articles naming conventions]] -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments :( | ||
--[[User:Asqueella|asqueella]] | |||
* [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) | * [[Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access]]: too incomplete, basically useless --[[User:Wintogreen|Wintogreen]] 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST) |
Revision as of 20:05, 29 March 2005
Last set of articles deleted. Hopefully, I haven't missed anything. Thanks to everyone for pointing them out. Cookies all around! --hao2lian
- Dev : Extensions : Beginner, old redirect (now double-redirect) page.
- Bob_jackson - vandalism
- Articles naming conventions/Talk:Articles naming conventions -- my (unsuccessful) grammar experiments :(
- Thunderbird : FAQs : Network Access: too incomplete, basically useless --Wintogreen 00:41, 28 Mar 2005 (PST)
- Firefox : Tips : Profile without .slt: considering that Firefox no longer uses .slt, is there any point in keeping this article? (links to it would have to be cleared) --wintogreen
- Kb:Votes for deletion. Yeah, I vote to delete the wikipedia-style deletion page and all of its associated pages (such as Kb:Deletion policy). Why? Because the current system is simpler and it works fine for this kb. No need to bring in wikipedia-style bureaucracy to the mozillazine kb, which is narrow in scope and has only a handful of active contributors. --wintogreen
- Seconded. --asqueella