Pages voted for deletion: Difference between revisions

From MozillaZine Knowledge Base
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Discussion: edited my last comment)
Line 16: Line 16:
I noticed we also have a [[Firefox_Materials]] , [[Seamonkey_Materials]] , [[Thunderbird_Materials]] , [[Sunbird_Materials]], [[Camino_Materials]] and [[Mozilla_Materials]] article each of which has no (real) category and is redirected to http://mozilla.wikia.com/wiki/Marketing:Mozilla_Materials . That seems like the only people who could find those articles already know how to find the web site, so its not clear what purpose they serve. I suggest they be deleted too. If thats not acceptable it would seem to make more sense to rename Firefox_Materials to Firefox Marketing and add it to Category:Firefox etc. so that somebody who doesn't know the magic word (materials) could either stumble across it when browsing the Firefox articles or find it via searching for marketing.  [[User:Tanstaafl|Tanstaafl]] 01:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I noticed we also have a [[Firefox_Materials]] , [[Seamonkey_Materials]] , [[Thunderbird_Materials]] , [[Sunbird_Materials]], [[Camino_Materials]] and [[Mozilla_Materials]] article each of which has no (real) category and is redirected to http://mozilla.wikia.com/wiki/Marketing:Mozilla_Materials . That seems like the only people who could find those articles already know how to find the web site, so its not clear what purpose they serve. I suggest they be deleted too. If thats not acceptable it would seem to make more sense to rename Firefox_Materials to Firefox Marketing and add it to Category:Firefox etc. so that somebody who doesn't know the magic word (materials) could either stumble across it when browsing the Firefox articles or find it via searching for marketing.  [[User:Tanstaafl|Tanstaafl]] 01:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


: I vote to delete the [[:Category:Marketing]] (just created a few days ago  by [[User:Ottodv]]) and also the [[Mozilla Community Wiki]] article which is where all the "Marketing" articles you mentioned redirect to. Thhe [[Mozilla Community Wiki]] article  simply says, ''[[:Category:Mozilla Materials|Mozilla Materials]] projects have moved to [http://mozilla.wikicities.com/wiki/Marketing:Mozilla_Materials Mozilla Community Wiki]'' ...but there is no [[:Category:Mozilla Materials]] and we are voting now to delete the new [[:Category:Marketing]].  By the way, I also noticed there is a [[Talk:Firefox Materials]] page that should also be deleted, if you're going to delete the rest. [[User:Alice Wyman|Alice Wyman]] 03:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
: I vote to delete the [[:Category:Marketing]] (just created a few days ago  by [[User:Ottodv]]).  All the "Materials" articles you mentioned redirect to the [[Mozilla Community Wiki]] article, which simply says, ''[[:Category:Mozilla Materials|Mozilla Materials]] projects have moved to [http://mozilla.wikicities.com/wiki/Marketing:Mozilla_Materials Mozilla Community Wiki]''. Another idea would be to rename [[Mozilla Community Wiki]] to "Mozilla Marketing" and add that article to the top-level category, instead of adding new articles to the Firefox, Thunderbird, etc., categories.   [[User:Alice Wyman|Alice Wyman]] 03:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:38, 10 January 2007

Add {{vfd}} to candidates for deletion. Discuss candidates here and cast your vote by adding delete or keep. See Vandalism for list of vandals to be blocked. See List of candidates for the list. Deletion log

Discussion

Old Input Focus - article from over a year ago that may or may not be fixed and may or may not have ever existed. The "fix" given is to close the window, which isn't that great of a fix anyway.--Np 02:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Tanstaafl 00:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Article/Express_Computer_._Which_browser_should_you_use?_._July_2004 Article/Netcraft_._Will_Firefox_repeat_Netscape's_mistakes?_._July_26,_2004

These articles are empty, and seem like they were outdated marketing fluff. I can understand links to promotional materials such as buttons etc. at http://wiki.mozilla.org/Marketing:Firefox_Materials but not this type of article. Didn't we try to get rid of these articles beforehand? I noticed them only because somebody created a marketing category and assigned them to it. Tanstaafl 00:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Alice Wyman 03:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Marketing - It links to two empty articles plus one of the material projects. If we need to provide links to sites such as Firefox materials, Thunderbird materials, Sunbird materials etc. I think a better solution would be to have a single article called Marketing that points to each applications material web site plus community web sites such as http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ . My concern is that this category is going to become a haven for all sorts of outdated marketing fluff. Let the web sites that specialize in marketing do all of the marketing.

I noticed we also have a Firefox_Materials , Seamonkey_Materials , Thunderbird_Materials , Sunbird_Materials, Camino_Materials and Mozilla_Materials article each of which has no (real) category and is redirected to http://mozilla.wikia.com/wiki/Marketing:Mozilla_Materials . That seems like the only people who could find those articles already know how to find the web site, so its not clear what purpose they serve. I suggest they be deleted too. If thats not acceptable it would seem to make more sense to rename Firefox_Materials to Firefox Marketing and add it to Category:Firefox etc. so that somebody who doesn't know the magic word (materials) could either stumble across it when browsing the Firefox articles or find it via searching for marketing. Tanstaafl 01:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I vote to delete the Category:Marketing (just created a few days ago by User:Ottodv). All the "Materials" articles you mentioned redirect to the Mozilla Community Wiki article, which simply says, Mozilla Materials projects have moved to Mozilla Community Wiki. Another idea would be to rename Mozilla Community Wiki to "Mozilla Marketing" and add that article to the top-level category, instead of adding new articles to the Firefox, Thunderbird, etc., categories. Alice Wyman 03:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)